|
|
|
ISO 9000:2000 Auditors Checklist The following is a checklist developed by Manoj M Nair & A. Udaya Shankar to assess the requirements of the 2000 version of the ISO 9000 standard. The checklist also contains a guideline for assessors and a sheet for recording auditing notes, which may be reproduced by the assessors and attached as alternate sheets to the checklist. Comments are appreciated. Please comment or send your gratitude to velosi@omantel.net.om. |
|
If you would like to get involved with the ISO Support Group please contact us... isogroup@isogroup.net
|
ISO
9001 : 2000 QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
AUDIT
CHECK LIST
Clause Ref. |
REQUIREMENTS |
*Evaluation
Status |
4.0
QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM |
||
4.1 |
General
requirements |
|
4.1.1 |
Does
the organization establish document, implement, maintain and
continually improve a Quality Management System in accordance with
ISO 9001 : 2000 with due consideration given to: |
|
|
a)
identification of processes needed for Quality Management
System; |
|
|
b)
determination of sequence and interaction of these processes; |
|
|
c)
determination of criteria and methods required to ensure
effective operation and control of above processes; |
|
|
d)
availability and control of information required to support
operation and monitoring of processes; |
|
|
e)
measure, monitor and analyze the processes and implement
action to achieve planned results and continual improvement. |
|
4.2 |
General
documentation requirements |
|
4.2.1 |
Has
the organization established documented procedures for: |
|
|
ź
Control of documents; |
|
|
ź
Control of quality records; |
|
|
ź
Internal Audit; |
|
|
ź
Control of non-conformity; |
|
|
ź
Corrective action; |
|
|
ź
Preventive action. |
|
4.2.2 |
Has
the organization identified and controlled document, particularly
those needed to ensure effective operation and control of its
processes? |
|
|
Note:
Documented procedures / documents may be in any form or type
of medium. |
|
|
||
Summary:
ź
Acceptable
ź
Nonconformity Observed Auditor
Signature:__________________ |
||
*Evaluation
Status: Indicate
“Yes” for compliance
“No” for non-compliance |
5.0
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY |
||
5.1 |
Management
commitment |
|
5.1.1 |
Is
there evidence of commitment by top management towards development
and improvement of the Quality Management System through the
following: |
|
|
a)
does sufficient awareness to regulatory and legal
requirements exist as applicable to organization scope of product
offered? |
|
|
b)
does top management initiate action / measures to communicate
to the organization the importance of meeting customer requirement? |
|
|
c)
does top management review resource requirements or have in
place measures to collect data on the same and provide timely
resources to achieve quality objectives? |
|
|
d)
does the top management actions provide evidence of
commitment to the 8 principles of quality management? |
|
|
e)
Does the top management conduct Management Review of their
Quality Management System? |
|
5.2 |
Customer
focus |
|
5.2.1 |
Does
the top management have methodologies to ensure that: Customer
needs and expectations are determined through their Quality
Management System, and these are converted into requirements and
fulfilled with the aim of achieving customer satisfaction. |
|
5.2.2 |
Are
obligations related to product, including legal and regulatory
requirements identified and measures established to fulfill the
same? |
|
5.3 |
Quality
policy |
|
5.3.1 |
Has
the top management: |
|
|
a)
established a Quality Policy? |
|
|
b)
is the Quality Policy signed by top management? |
|
|
c)
is the Quality Policy appropriate to the purpose of the
organization? |
|
|
d)
does the Quality Policy include a statement of commitment to
meeting requirements, customer satisfaction and to continual
improvement? |
|
|
e)
is the Quality Policy communicated and understood at
appropriate levels in the organization through adequate measures? |
|
|
f)
are mechanism for review of Quality Policy for its
suitability established by the top management? |
|
|
g)
is the Quality Policy controlled? (5.5.6) |
|
5.4 |
Planning |
|
5.4.1 |
Quality
objectives
|
|
5.4.1.1 |
Are
quality objectives established by top management at relevant
functions and levels within the organization? |
|
5.4.1.2 |
Are
the objectives measurable to ensure efficiency and effectiveness of
the organization? |
|
5.4.1.3 |
Are
the objectives consistent with the Quality Policy including
commitment to continual improvement? |
|
5.4.1.4 |
Does
the objectives include relevant objective to meet requirements of
product? |
|
5.4.2 |
Quality
planning
|
|
5.4.2.1 |
Are
the output of quality planning documented? |
|
5.4.2.2 |
Does
quality planning include: |
|
|
i)
the processes of Quality Management System,
considering permissible exclusions (Sec
1.2 of ISO 9001 – 2000); |
|
|
ii)
assessment of resource needed; |
|
|
iii)
continual improvement of the Quality Management System. |
|
5.4.2.3 |
Are
changes to quality planning effected in a controlled manner? |
|
5.4.2.4 |
Is
the integrity of Quality Management System maintained during the
change process, when changes are initiated? |
|
5.5 |
Administration |
|
5.5.1 |
General
|
|
5.5.2 |
Responsibility
and authority
|
|
5.5.2.1 |
Has
the organization identified function and interrelations to
facilitate effective quality management? |
|
5.5.2.2 |
Has
the organization define composition of top management? |
|
5.5.2.3 |
Has
an organization chart been prepared to identify various
interrelationships? |
|
5.5.2.4 |
Have
responsibilities and authorities been defined and communicated to
those involved in the effective operation of the Quality Management
System? |
|
5.5.3 |
Management
representative
|
|
5.5.3.1 |
Are
member(s) of the management appointed as a “Management
Representative” by the top management? |
|
5.5.3.2 |
Does
the Management Representative have responsibility and authority that
includes: |
|
|
a)
ensuring that the processes of the Quality Management System
are established and maintained. |
|
|
b)
reporting to management on the performance of the Quality
Management System, including needs for improvement. |
|
|
c)
promoting awareness of customer requirements throughout the
organization. |
|
5.5.4 |
Internal
communication
|
|
5.5.4.1 |
Does
organization ensure communication at various levels and functions
regarding the processes of Quality Management System and their
effectiveness? |
|
5.5.5 |
Quality
manual
|
|
5.5.5.1 |
Has
a Quality Manual been established and maintained? |
|
5.5.5.2 |
Does
the Quality Manual include: |
|
|
a)
scope of Quality Management System; |
|
|
b)
details of exclusion to Section 7.0 with justification; |
|
|
c)
documented procedures or reference to them; |
|
|
d)
description of the sequence and interaction of the processes
included in the Quality Management System relevant to the
organization activities, its size, complexity of operations and
competency of personnel. |
|
5.5.5.3 |
Is
the Quality Manual controlled? (5.5.6) |
|
5.5.6 |
Control
of documents
|
|
5.5.6.1 |
Has
a documented procedure been established to control all documents
(including documents defined as Quality Records) required for the
Quality Management System? |
|
5.5.6.2 |
Does
the procedure include controls for: |
|
|
a)
approval of documents for adequacy prior to issue; |
|
|
b)
review, update, as necessary and re-approve documents; |
|
|
c)
to identify the current revision status of documents; |
|
|
d)
to ensure that relevant versions of applicable documents are
available at points of use; |
|
|
e)
to ensure that documents remain legible, readily identifiable
and retrievable; |
|
|
f)
to ensure that documents of external origin are identified
and their distribution controlled; |
|
|
g)
to prevent the unintended use of obsolete documents, and to
apply suitable identification to them if they are retained for any
purpose. |
|
5.5.7 |
Control
of quality records
|
|
5.5.7.1 |
Has
a documented procedure been established for the identification,
storage, retrieval, protection, retention time and disposition of
quality records? |
|
5.5.7.2 |
Are
quality records subjected to control? |
|
5.5.7.3 |
Has
the organization identified quality records to the extent required
to provide evidence of conformance to requirements and of effective
operation of the Quality Management System? |
|
5.5.7.4 |
Check
control of records for the following: |
|
|
ź
Results of management review (5.6); |
|
|
ź
Records of education, experience, training and qualification
(6.2.2); |
|
|
ź
Results of review of product requirements and subsequent
follow-up actions (7.2.2); |
|
|
ź
Results of design and / or development review and subsequent
follow-up actions (7.3.4); |
|
|
ź
Results of design and / or development verification and
subsequent follow-up actions (7.3.5); |
|
|
ź
Results of design and / or development validation and
subsequent follow-up actions (7.3.6); |
|
|
ź
Results of design and / or development changes and subsequent
follow-up actions (7.3.7); |
|
|
ź
Results of supplier evaluations and follow-up actions (7.4.1); |
|
|
ź
Unique identification of the product, when traceability is
requirement (7.5.2). |
|
|
ź
Results of calibration for measurement and monitoring devices
(7.6). |
|
|
ź
Authority responsible for release of the product (8.2.4). |
|
5.5.7.5 |
Are
there recorded evidences of compliance for the following, as
applicable: |
|
|
ź
Customer property that is lost, damaged or otherwise
unsuitable for use reported to the customer; |
|
|
ź
Process validation records; |
|
|
ź
Basis of calibration in the absence of traceable national or
international standards; |
|
|
ź
Results of corrective action taken; |
|
|
ź
Results of preventive action taken. |
|
5.6 |
Management
review |
|
5.6.1 |
Does
the top management review the Quality Management System to ensure
its continuing suitability, adequacy and effectiveness? Are
the review intervals planned? |
|
5.6.2 |
Review input |
|
5.6.2.1 |
Does
review input include current performance and improvement
opportunities related to: |
|
|
a)
results of audits; |
|
|
b)
customer feedback; |
|
|
c)
process performance and product conformance; |
|
|
d)
status of corrective and preventive actions; |
|
|
e)
follow-up action from earlier management reviews; |
|
|
f)
changes that could affect Quality Management System |
|
5.6.3 |
Review
output
|
|
|
Does
output from management review include actions related to: |
|
|
a)
improvement of the Quality Management System and its
processes; |
|
|
b)
improvement of product related to customer requirements; |
|
|
c)
resource needs. |
|
5.6.4 |
Are
results of management review recorded (5.5.7) |
|
|
||
Summary:
ź
Acceptable
ź
Nonconformity Observed Auditor
Signature:__________________ |
||
*Evaluation
Status: Indicate
“Yes” for compliance
“No” for non-compliance |
6.0
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT |
||
6.1 |
Provision
of resources |
|
6.1.1 |
Does
the organization implement methods to determine and provide
resources needed to? |
|
|
a)
implement and improve the processes of the Quality Management
System and |
|
|
b)
address customer satisfaction. |
|
6.1.2 |
Are
the resources allocated on time? |
|
6.2 |
Human
resources |
|
6.2.1 |
Assignment
of personnel
|
|
6.2.1.1 |
Are
personnel with assigned responsibilities defined in the Quality
Management System competent on the basis of: |
|
|
ź
applicable education; |
|
|
ź
training; |
|
|
ź
skills; |
|
|
ź
experience. |
|
6.2.2 |
Training,
awareness and competency
|
|
6.2.2.1 |
Are
competency needs for personnel performing activities affecting
quality identified? |
|
6.2.2.2 |
Are
training provided to satisfy the competency needs? |
|
6.2.2.3 |
Are
the effectiveness of the training evaluated and follow-up action
initiated? |
|
6.2.2.4 |
Does
the organization ensure that its employees are aware of the
relevance and importance of their activities and how they contribute
to the achievement of quality objectives? |
|
6.2.2.5 |
Are
records of education, experience, training and qualifications
maintained? (5.5.7) |
|
6.3 |
Facilities |
|
6.3.1 |
Have
the facilities needed to achieve the conformity of product been
identified and provided including: |
|
|
a)
work space and associated facilities; |
|
|
b)
equipment, hardware and software; |
|
|
c)
supporting services. |
|
6.3.2 |
Are
such facilities maintained to achieve conformity of product? |
|
6.4 |
Work
environment |
|
6.4.1 |
Have
the type of work environment suitable for process operations
defined? |
|
6.4.2 |
Are
human and physical factors of the work environment needed to achieve
conformity of product identified and managed by the organization? |
|
|
||
Summary:
ź
Acceptable
ź
Nonconformity Observed Auditor
Signature:__________________ |
||
*Evaluation
Status: Indicate
“Yes” for compliance
“No” for non-compliance |
7.0
PRODUCT REALIZATION |
||
7.1 |
Planning
of realization processes |
|
7.1.1 |
Has
the organization determined the following, as appropriate, in
planning the processes for realization of product: |
|
|
ź
quality objectives for the product, project or contract; |
|
|
ź
the need to establish processes and documentation and provide
resources and facilities specific to the product; |
|
|
ź
verification and validation activities and the criteria for
acceptability; |
|
|
ź
the records that are necessary to provide confidence of
conformity of the processes and resulting product. |
|
7.1.2 |
Is
the planning of the realization processes consistent with other
requirements of the organization’s Quality Management System and
documented in a form suitable for the organization’s method of
operation? |
|
7.1.3 |
Are
there any exclusion adopted by the organization on the requirements
in section 7.0 of ISO 9001 – 2000 and are such exclusions defined
in the Quality Manual (5.5.5)
with justification? |
|
7.2 |
Customer
related processes |
|
7.2.1 |
Identification
of customer requirements
|
|
7.2.1.1 |
Are
processes established by the organization to determine customer
requirements including: |
|
|
ź
product requirements specified by the customer, including
requirements for availability, delivery and support; |
|
|
ź
product requirements not specified by the customer but
necessary for intended or specified use. |
|
|
ź
obligations related to product, including regulatory and
legal requirements. |
|
7.2.2 |
Review
of product requirements
|
|
7.2.2.1 |
Does
the organization review customer requirements and other requirements
determined by the organization prior to commitment to supply a
product? |
|
7.2.2.2 |
Are
stages of review (submission of a tender, acceptance of contract or
order) established? |
|
7.2.2.3 |
Does
the review process ensure that: |
|
|
ź
product requirements are defined; |
|
|
ź
where the customer provides no documented statement of
requirement, the customer requirements are confirmed before
acceptance; |
|
|
ź
contract or order requirements differing from those
previously expressed are resolved; |
|
|
ź
the organization has the ability to meet defined
requirements. |
|
7.2.2.4 |
Does
the review processes ensure that product change requirements are
made aware to relevant personnel in the organization? |
|
7.2.2.5 |
Are
amendments made to relevant documentation? |
|
7.2.2.6 |
Are
the results of review and subsequent follow-up actions recorded? (5.5.7) |
|
7.2.3 |
Customer
communication
|
|
7.2.3.1 |
Are
arrangements for communication identified and implemented by the
organization relating to: |
|
|
ź
product information; |
|
|
ź
enquiries, contract or order handling, including amendments; |
|
|
ź
customer feedback, including customer complaints. |
|
7.3 |
Design
and / or development |
|
7.3.1 |
Design
and / or development planning
|
|
7.3.1.1 |
Does
the organization plan and control design and / or development of the
product? |
|
7.3.1.2 |
Does
the design and / or development planning determine: |
|
|
ź
stages of design and / or development processes; |
|
|
ź
review, verification and validation activities appropriate to
each design and / or development stage; |
|
|
ź
responsibilities and authorities for design and / or
development activities. |
|
7.3.1.3 |
Does
the organization manage interfaces between different groups involved
in design and / or development to ensure effective communication and
clarity of responsibilities? |
|
7.3.1.4 |
Are
the design and / or development planning output updated, as
appropriate, as the design and / or development progresses? |
|
7.3.2 |
Design
and / or development inputs
|
|
7.3.2.1 |
Are
inputs relating to product requirements defined, documented and
reviewed for adequacy? |
|
7.3.2.2 |
Does
the design and / or development input include: |
|
|
ź
functional and performance requirements; |
|
|
ź
applicable regulatory and legal requirements; |
|
|
ź
applicable information derived from previous similar design
and / or development; |
|
|
ź
any other requirements essential for design. |
|
7.3.2.3 |
Are
all incomplete, ambiguous or conflicting requirements identified
during review and resolved? |
|
7.3.3 |
Design
and / or development outputs
|
|
7.3.3.1 |
Does
the organization document design output in a manner that enables
verification against the design and / or development inputs? |
|
7.3.3.2 |
Does
the design and / or development output: |
|
|
ź
meet the design input requirements; |
|
|
ź
provide appropriate information for production and service
operations; |
|
|
ź
contain or reference product acceptance criteria; |
|
|
ź
define the characteristics of the product that are essential
to its safe and proper use. |
|
7.3.3.3 |
Are
all design and / or development output approved prior to release? |
|
7.3.4 |
Design
and / or development review
|
|
7.3.4.1 |
Does
the organization identify suitable stages for systematic reviews of
design and / or development to: |
|
|
a)
evaluate the ability to fulfill requirements; |
|
|
b)
identify problems and propose follow-up actions. |
|
7.3.4.2 |
Does
the participants in such reviews include representatives of function
concerned with the design and / or development stage(s) being
reviewed? |
|
7.3.4.3 |
Are
the results of review and subsequent follow-up actions recorded? (5.5.7) |
|
7.3.5 |
Design
and / or development verification
|
|
7.3.5.1 |
Are
design and / or development verification performed to ensure the
output meets the design and / or development inputs? |
|
7.3.5.2 |
Are
the results of verification and subsequent follow-up actions
recorded? (5.5.7) |
|
7.3.6 |
Design
and / or development validation
|
|
7.3.6.1 |
Is
the design and / or development validation performed to confirm that
resulting product is capable of meeting the requirements of intended
use? |
|
7.3.6.2 |
Where
it is impractical to perform full validation prior to delivery or
implementation, does the organization perform partial validation to
the extent applicable? |
|
7.3.6.3 |
Are
results of validation and subsequent follow-up actions recorded? (5.5.7) |
|
7.3.7 |
Control
of design and / or development changes
|
|
7.3.7.1 |
Are
processes established to identify, document and control design
changes? |
|
7.3.7.2 |
Are
the effect of changes evaluated on constituent parts and delivered
products? |
|
7.3.7.3 |
Are
all design and / or development changes verified and validated, as
appropriate and approved before implementation? |
|
7.3.7.4 |
Are
the results of review of changes and subsequent follow-up actions
documented? (5.5.7) |
|
7.4 |
Purchasing |
|
7.4.1 |
Purchasing
control
|
|
7.4.1.1 |
Does
the organization control its purchasing processes to ensure
purchased product conforms to requirements? |
|
7.4.1.2 |
Does
the type and extent of control exercised by the organization depend
upon the effect on subsequent realization processes and their
output? |
|
7.4.1.3 |
Does
the organization evaluate and select suppliers based on their
ability to supply product in accordance with the organization
requirements? |
|
7.4.1.4 |
Are
criteria for selection and periodic evaluation of suppliers defined? |
|
7.4.1.5 |
Are
the results of evaluation and subsequent follow-up actions recorded?
(5.5.7) |
|
7.4.2 |
Purchasing
control |
|
7.4.2.1 |
Has
the organization defined as to what constitutes a purchasing
document? |
|
7.4.2.2 |
Does
purchasing documents contain information describing the product to
be purchased, including where appropriate: |
|
|
a)
requirements for approval or qualification of :
ź
Product
ź
Processes
ź
Procedures
ź
Equipment and
ź
Personnel |
|
|
b)
quality Management System requirements |
|
7.4.2.3 |
Do
the purchase processes of the organization ensure the adequacy of
specified requirements in the purchasing documents prior to their
release? |
|
7.4.3 |
Verification
of purchased product
|
|
7.4.3.1 |
Has
the organization identified and implemented the activities necessary
for verification of purchased product |
|
7.4.3.2 |
Does
the organization specify the intended verification arrangements (by
organization / customer) and method of product release, as part of
the purchasing information? |
|
7.5 |
Production
and service operation |
|
7.5.1 |
Operations
control
|
|
7.5.1.1 |
Does
the organization control production and service operation through: |
|
|
a)
the availability of information that specifies the
characteristics of the product; |
|
|
b)
where necessary, the availability of work instructions; |
|
|
c)
the use and maintenance of suitable equipment for production
and service operations; |
|
|
d)
the availability and use of measuring and monitoring devices; |
|
|
e)
the implementation of monitoring activities; |
|
|
f)
the implementation of defined processes for release, delivery
and applicable post-delivery activities. |
|
7.5.2 |
Identification
and treaceability
|
|
7.5.2.1 |
Does
the organization identify, where appropriate, the product by
suitable means throughout production and service operations? |
|
7.5.2.2 |
Are
the status of the product with respect to measurement and monitoring
identified? |
|
7.5.2.3 |
Does
the organization control and record the unique identification of the
product, where traceability is a requirement? (5.5.7) |
|
7.5.3 |
Customer
property
|
|
7.5.3.1 |
Are
processes established to exercise care with customer property while
it is under the organization’s control or being used by the
organization? |
|
7.5.3.2 |
Does
the processes address following issues related to customer property: |
|
|
ź
Verification
ź
Protection
ź
Maintenance |
|
7.5.3.3 |
Does
the process ensure that occurrence of any customer property that is
lost, damaged or otherwise found to be unsuitable for use are recorded
and reported to the customer? |
|
7.5.4 |
Preservation
of product
|
|
7.5.4.1 |
Are
methods and controls established by the organization to preserve
conformity of product with customer requirements during internal
processing and delivery to intended destination? |
|
7.5.4.2 |
Does
the methods and controls include: |
|
|
ź
Identification
ź
Handling
ź
Packaging ź
Storage
ź
Protection |
|
7.5.4.3 |
Are
the controls extended to constituent parts of a product? |
|
7.5.5 |
Validation
of processes
|
|
7.5.5.1 |
Has
the organization identified production and service processes which
requires to be validated? |
|
|
Note:
Processes require validation when resulting output cannot be
verified by subsequent measurement or monitoring.
This includes any process where deficiencies may become
apparent only after the product is in use or the service has been
delivered. |
|
7.5.5.2 |
Are
the processes validated to demonstrate their ability to achieve
planned results? |
|
7.5.5.3 |
Are
the validation arrangements defined and include the following, as
applicable: |
|
|
a)
qualification of processes; |
|
|
b)
qualification of equipment and personnel; |
|
|
c)
use of defined methodologies and procedures; |
|
|
d)
requirements for records; |
|
|
e)
re-validation. |
|
7.6 |
Control
of measuring and monitoring devices |
|
7.6.1 |
Has
the organization identified the measurements to be made and the
measuring and monitoring devices required to assure conformity of
product to specified requirement? |
|
7.6.2 |
Are
the measuring and monitoring devices used and controlled to ensure
that measurement capability is consistent with the measurement
requirements? |
|
7.6.3 |
Where
applicable, are the measuring and monitoring devices: |
|
|
a)
calibrated and adjusted periodically or prior to use, against
devices traceable to international or national standards; where no
such standards exit, the basis used for calibration shall be
recorded; |
|
|
b)
safeguarded from adjustments that would invalidate the
calibration; |
|
|
c)
protected from damage and deterioration during handling,
maintenance and storage; |
|
|
d)
have the results of their calibration recorded (5.5.7); |
|
|
e)
have the validity of previous results re-assessed , if they
are subsequently found to be out of calibration, and corrective
action taken. |
|
7.6.4 |
Are
softwares used for measuring and monitoring of specified requirement
validated prior to use? |
|
|
||
Summary:
ź
Acceptable
ź
Nonconformity Observed Auditor
Signature:__________________ |
||
*Evaluation
Status: Indicate
“Yes” for compliance
“No” for non-compliance |
8.0
MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT |
||
8.1 |
Planning |
|
8.1.1 |
Has
the organization established plans to implement the measurement and
monitoring activities needed to assure conformity and achieve
improvement? |
|
8.1.2 |
Has
the organization defined the processes for measurement and
monitoring activities including determination of the need for, and
use of, applicable methodologies including statistical techniques? |
|
8.2 |
Measurement
and monitoring |
|
8.2.1 |
Customer
satisfaction
|
|
8.2.1.1 |
Has
the organization determined the methodologies for obtaining the
information on customer satisfaction and / or dissatisfaction? |
|
8.2.1.2 |
Are
the informations monitored as one of the measurements of performance
of the Quality Management System? |
|
8.2.2 |
Internal
audit
|
|
8.2.2.1 |
Have
a documented procedure been established that include: |
|
|
ź
responsibilities; |
|
|
ź
requirements for conducting the audit; |
|
|
ź
ensuring audit independence; |
|
|
ź
recording results of the audit; |
|
|
ź
reporting to the management. |
|
8.2.2.2 |
Are
audits planned in the form of a audit programme taking into
consideration: |
|
|
ź
status and importance of the activities and areas to be
audited; |
|
|
ź
results of previous audits. |
|
8.2.2.3 |
Is
the frequency of audit defined? |
|
8.2.2.4 |
Are
the plans reviewed at periodic intervals? |
|
8.2.2.5 |
Does
the internal audit process have the following objectives to
determine whether Quality Management System: |
|
|
ź
Conform to the requirements of this international standard; |
|
|
ź
Has been effectively implemented and maintained. |
|
8.2.2.6 |
Does
the management take timely corrective action on deficiencies found
during the audit? |
|
8.2.2.7 |
Are
follow-up actions part of the audit process and include: |
|
|
ź
verification of the implementation of corrective action; |
|
|
ź
reporting of verification results. |
|
8.2.3 |
Measurement
and monitoring of processes
|
|
8.2.3.1 |
Are
suitable methods established for measurement and monitoring of those
realization processes necessary to meet customer requirements? |
|
8.2.3.2 |
Do
the methods confirm the continuing ability of each process to
satisfy intended purpose? |
|
8.2.4 |
Measurement
and monitoring of product
|
|
8.2.4.1 |
Has
the organization established appropriate stages to measure and
monitor product characteristics? |
|
8.2.4.2 |
Are
there evidences to confirm that product characteristics meet the
requirements for the product? |
|
8.2.4.3 |
Are
the evidence of conformity with the acceptance criteria documented? |
|
8.2.4.4 |
Do
the measurement and monitoring records indicate the authority
responsible for release of the product? (5.5.7) |
|
8.2.4.5 |
Are
product / service delivery effected after all the specified
activities have been satisfactorily completed, unless otherwise
approved by the customer. |
|
8.3 |
Control
of non-conformity |
|
8.3.1 |
Have
a documented procedure been established to define the processes
involved in control of nonconformity? |
|
8.3.2 |
Does
the processes ensure that product that does not conform to
requirements is identified and controlled to prevent unintended use
or delivery? |
|
8.3.3 |
Are
nonconforming product corrected and subject to re-verification after
correction to demonstrate conformity? |
|
8.3.4 |
Does
the processes ensure that appropriate action regarding the
consequences of non-conformity is initiated, when non-conforming
product is detected after delivery or use has started by interested
parties? |
|
8.3.5 |
When
required, does the organization report for concession to the
customer, the end user, regulatory body or other body regarding the
proposed rectification of non-conforming product? |
|
8.4 |
Analysis
of data |
|
8.4.1 |
Does
the organization employ measures to collect and analyze appropriate
data to determine the suitability and effectiveness of the Quality
Management System and to identify improvements that can be made? |
|
8.4.2 |
Does
the data include those generated by measuring and monitoring
activities and other relevant sources? |
|
8.4.3 |
Does
the data used for analysis provide information on: |
|
|
ź
customer satisfaction and / or dissatisfaction; |
|
|
ź
conformance to customer requirements; |
|
|
ź
characteristics of process, product and their trends; |
|
|
ź
suppliers. |
|
8.5 |
Improvement |
|
8.5.1 |
Planning
for continual improvement
|
|
8.5.1.1 |
Does
the organization plan and manage processes necessary for the
continual improvement of the Quality Management System. |
|
8.5.1.2 |
Does
the organization use the following information to facilitate
continual improvement of the Quality Management System: |
|
|
ź
Quality Policy
ź
Quality Objectives ź
Audit Results
ź
Analysis of Data ź
Corrective and Preventive Action
ź
Management Review |
|
8.5.1.3 |
Are
there objective evidences of continual improvement with involvement
of top management? |
|
8.5.2 |
Corrective
action
|
|
8.5.2.1 |
Has
the organization established a documented procedure for corrective
action with defined requirements for: |
|
|
a)
identifying non-conformities (including customer complaints); |
|
|
b)
determining the causes of non-conformity; |
|
|
c)
evaluating the need for actions to ensure that
non-conformities do not recur; |
|
|
d)
determining and implementing the corrective action needed; |
|
|
e)
recording results of action taken; |
|
|
f)
reviewing of corrective action taken. |
|
8.5.2.2 |
Are
corrective actions taken to eliminate causes of non-conformities
appropriate to the impact of the problems encountered? |
|
8.5.3 |
Preventive
action
|
|
8.5.3.1 |
Has
the organization established a documented procedure for preventive
action with defined requirements for: |
|
|
a)
identifying potential non-conformities and their causes; |
|
|
b)
determining and ensuring the implementation of preventive
action needed; |
|
|
c)
recording results of action taken; |
|
|
d)
reviewing of preventive action taken. |
|
8.5.3.2 |
Are
preventive action taken to eliminate causes of potential
non-conformities appropriate to the impact of the potential problem? |
|
|
||
Summary:
ź
Acceptable
ź
Nonconformity Observed Auditor
Signature:__________________ |
||
*Evaluation
Status: Indicate
“Yes” for compliance
“No” for non-compliance |
GUIDELINES
FOR USE OF
QUALITY
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM CHECKLIST
1.
This checklist is based on DIS ISO 9001 – 2000 November 1999
version for “Quality
Management Systems – Requirements”.
2.
This checklist shall be used by trained and practicing auditors to
evaluate or assess Quality Management Systems – Requirements based on ISO
9001 – 2000.
3.
The auditors are expected to use a greater degree of discretion and
therefore must be careful
and thoughtful
prior to establishing a “deficiency”
against a requirement. Evidence
for visible top management commitment and quality management action must be
looked for.
4.
The bold numerical typescript used in the checklist under the column
for Clause
Ref. with titles shall be treated as the “Requirement”
clause. This may be referred on the nonconformity statements prepared by the
auditor. Other sub-clauses are
checklist specific and are intended to cover the check points under the “Requirement”
clause.
5.
During assessment of each requirement, the auditors shall
consistently apply the 8 principles of quality management defined in ISO
9000 – 2000.
6.
The auditors shall bear in mind that requirements elaborated in ISO
9004 – 2000 are only guidelines for improving efficiency but are
not guidelines for implementation of ISO 9001 – 2000 and therefore
the requirements must not be misinterpreted or substantiated using this
standard.
7.
Auditor attention is drawn to the requirements stipulated in clause
1.2 of ISO 9001 – 2000 on permissible exclusions.
The text in this clause should be carefully and judiciously applied.
Auditors shall ensure that exclusions are supported with appropriate
justification.
ISO
9001 : 2000
QUALITY
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
AUDIT
CHECKLIST
AUDIT
NOTES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Auditor
Name:________________
Signature:________________ |
ISO Support Group, A Division of Intelex Corporation, 165 Spadina Avenue, 3rd Floor, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2C3 ph: 416-599-6009 f: 416-599-6867